|
|

In brief
|
|
|
Students will be introduced to the issues concerning
capital punishment in a web/classroom/group-work environment. They
will learn the arguments from both sides of the issue in order to
reflect on their own position on the matter and make informed arguments
for their positions. In addition, using the informed arguments
and resources drawn from the Web site, the students will read and
deliberate on the issues of ethics and justice using an actual case
study in order to humanize the debate.
As early as the founding of the United States, the
validity of capital punishment has been a contentious public issue.
Recognizing the controversial nature of this subject, it is necessary
for informed citizens/students to examine the issue from different
perspectives. As a result, citizens and students alike will be
able to investigate this topic and make informed, persuasive arguments
concerning their position.
|
|
Rationale
|
|
|
The purpose of this unit is to engage
students in an examination of the arguments concerning capital punishment,
culminating in debates using an actual case study. In doing so they
will learn about the history of the death penalty, the stages in a
capital case, arguments for and against capital punishment, and insights
drawn from expert testimony. In addition to learning about the complex
issues associated with capital punishment, students will become more
familiar with identifying and making sound arguments, engaging in
critical evaluation of both sides of the issue, and marshaling evidence
to support positions for both sides. Finally they will debate about
capital punishment using an actual case study and reflect on their
own opinion of the death penalty. |
|
Outcomes
|
|
|
Students will be able to identify the
central issues concerning the death penalty from the past to the present
(early uses of the death penalty, deterrence, public sentiment and
the death penalty, stages in a capital case, and--most importantly--the
issues of fairness, equality, and justice). They will be able to
identify the states that have and donāt have the death penalty, in
order to investigate issues of fairness and justice. Students will
be able to explain the different positions on the capital punishment
issue, using evidence from the site. The simulation will provide
an opportunity for students to engage in substantive conversations
regarding the issue. Students will also participate in a persuasive
debate on the subject, using information provided by the web site
as well as core democratic values for support. |
|
Themes
|
|
|
Fairness and equality under
law; justice; purposes of punishment; identifying and constructing
sound arguments. |
|
NCSS Standards addressed
|
|
|
(See Appendix
D for National Council on Social Studies Standards, and Appendix
E for Michigan Standards.) |
|
Time:
|
|
|
2 weeks + |
|
Materials needed:
|
|
|
1.) Computer lab with Internet capabilities
2.) PowerPoint software or poster board and related display materials
(for group presentations)
3.) Death Penalty Main Site:
Primarily:
- History of the death penalty (to provide
historical context, thematic illustration of past and present
public opinion, and to serve as evidence for reports)
- Arguments and expert testimony for and against
the death penalty (to explore the various positions and use
of evidence)
- Stages in a capital case (to show the
process, from commission of the crime through trial, sentencing,
and appeals)
- Four Death Penalty Case Studies (to serve
as real life examples for students' deliberation, reports and
discussion)
Secondarily:
- State-by-State Data (to use in investigating
issues of fairness and justice - especially regarding differences
between states and ethnicity
|
|
Assessment:
|
|
|
Quick writes; learning journal entries (See Appendix
for descriptions); one quiz; group
work consisting of site research and argument/rebuttal posters and
presentations; one final essay; performance-based assessment of
group work (in other words, how students work together, how effectively
they share responsibility for the work, and how they engage the
content covered).
|
|
 |