|
|
|
Testimony in Opposition to the Death
Penalty
Reverend Jesse L. Jackson, Sr.
President and Chief Executive Officer, Rainbow/PUSH
Coalition, Inc. Excerpt from "Legal Lynching: Racism, Injustice & the
Death Penalty," (Marlowe & Company, 1996)
Who receives the death penalty has less to do with
the violence of the crime than with the color of the criminal's skin,
or more often, the color of the victim's skin. Murder -- always tragic
-- seems to be a more heinous and despicable crime in some states than
in others. Women who kill and who are killed are judged by different standards
than are men who are murderers and victims.
The death penalty is essentially an arbitrary punishment.
There are no objective rules or guidelines for when a prosecutor should
seek the death penalty, when a jury should recommend it, and when a judge
should give it. This lack of objective, measurable standards ensures that
the application of the death penalty will be discriminatory against racial,
gender, and ethnic groups.
The majority of Americans who support the death penalty
believe, or wish to believe, that legitimate factors such as the violence
and cruelty with which the crime was committed, a defendant's culpability
or history of violence, and the number of victims involved determine who
is sentenced to life in prison and who receives the ultimate punishment.
The numbers, however, tell a different story. They confirm the terrible
truth that bias and discrimination warp our nation's judicial system at
the very time it matters most -- in matters of life and death. The factors
that determine who will live and who will die -- race, sex, and geography
-- are the very same ones that blind justice was meant to ignore. This
prejudicial distribution should be a moral outrage to every American.
.
|
|